can these bones live?
Good questions from
Susie inspired me to make a distinction between
institutions and
communities. I reproduce my comment here.
I see institutions as the skeleton, and communities as the way our relationships flesh out and breathe life into those dry bones.
For example: a seminary as an institution exists in the endowments, the non-profit status, the buildings and assets, the denominational charter.
As a community it is formed new every year from faculty, staff, and students and their relationships, and cannot exist without each one's willingness to be vulnerable, to be changed and to change others with witness. Institutions can't minister to people. Communities can.
Institutions are machines. We build them and they run. If a person gets caught in the machinery, how would the machine know? Maybe it would notice something jamming the proper function, and eject it as a threat.
Communities can take account of the people in them, maybe strive to fulfill some of the duties I outlined last week.
But we need both.
Without the structure of an institution, a community can't take on a project that's very long or very broad.
Without live people working at creating and sustaining community, an institution can only be soulless and mindlessly destructive of people's spirits.
I'll say more:
it is the responsibility of EVERY person who participates in the life of an institution to help create community among the humans who work within that institution. We do this by listening to each other, speaking truth in love, praying our fears and resentments and acknowledging our vulnerable selves.